![]() |
||
S. 2307, FY 1999 Department of Transporation Appropriations Act (Report)
(continued)
Although the ARC will not have the results of the independent
assessment until November 1998, the Committee lauds the decision to begin working toward meeting its legislative charge. As a practical matter, the ARC is a temporary commission. After December 1999, the Commission must make a determination on whether or not Amtrak can meet the financial goals outlined in the ARAA. If the ARC determines these goals cannot be met, they must then submit a restructuring plan, and Amtrak must submit a liquidation plan. The Committee's recommended funding level, $450,000, will allow the ARC to decisively move forward in performing its tasks and responsibilities. These funds are available for 2 years, through September 30, 2000. The Committee is aware that the members of the ARC have been selected based on their technical qualifications, professional standing, and demonstrated expertise in areas relevant to the needs of the Council. Therefore, there should be no need for outside consultant services, and the Committee has included a provision precluding the use of appropriated funds for such services. Route closure and realignment recommendations. --Under current authority, the ARC can recommend improvements or changes in law that it believes to be necessary or appropriate, including recommending that the Amtrak Board of Directors close down or consolidate unprofitable routes. In addition, the sunset trigger in the ARAA directs the ARC to notify the President and the appropriate congressional committees if Amtrak's business performance prevents the railroad from meeting its financial goals, or if the ARC determines that continued Federal operating subsidies will be required after December 2, 2002. In order to help Amtrak work toward meeting its financial goals and to decrease reliance on Federal subsidies, the ARC shall identify Amtrak routes which are candidates for closure or realignment, and report to the Congress annually, as required under the ARAA, on these recommendations. The process for determining candidate routes for closure or realignment shall be based on Amtrak's own performance rankings, which incorporate information on each route's fully allocated costs and ridership on core intercity passenger service. A May 1998 General Accounting Office report entitled ``Financial Performance of Amtrak's Routes'' (GAO/RCED 98 151) examined the operating ratios for all of Amtrak's 40 intercity routes during fiscal year 1997, and ranked the routes by performance. The only profitable route on Amtrak's system is the New York to Washington, DC Metroliner. All other Amtrak routes lose money on a per passenger basis, from a low of $11 lost per passenger trip to a high of $284 lost per passenger. The average systemwide per passenger loss is $47. Though the Committee recognizes that the issue of connectivity is important to any passenger rail system, it is imperative that these losses be stemmed by judicious reductions and rationalizations. The Committee has determined that making recommendations for route closures or realignments is a task that is complementary to the Amtrak Reform Council's mission, and is well within the scope of the ARC's statutory responsibilities. General Provisions Political and Presidential appointees .--The Committee has included a provision in the bill (sec. 305), which is similar to general provisions that have been included in previous appropriations acts, which limits the number of political and Presidential appointees within the Department of Transportation. The Committee is recommending that the ceiling for fiscal year 1999 be 91 personnel. Advisory committees .--The Committee has retained a general provision (sec. 327) which would limit the amount of funds that could be used for the expenses of advisory committees utilized by the Department of Transportation. The limitation specified is $1,000,000. Rebates, refunds, and incentive payments .--The Department receives funds from various Government programs at different time intervals (that is, weekly, monthly, quarterly). For example, under the General Services Administration's Travel Management Center [TMC] Program, rebate checks received from the travel contractor are distributed monthly to each element of the Department in proportion to net domestic airline sales arranged by the contractor. Past expenditures have to be analyzed to determine the proper sources to refund which can be a time-consuming process. The staff time and cost associated with the precise accounting for each such refund is prohibitive. To alleviate the need to specifically identify the source for each repayment the Committee has included language (sec. 333) that allows a fair and sensible allocation of the rebates and miscellaneous and other funds. Many repayments are received late in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year or in the first quarter of the new fiscal year and thus are not effectively available to the agency for new obligations. For example, rebate checks for September travel are received from the travel management contractor in October. To maintain good financial management incentives and avoid injudicious commitments, this provision would provide specific authority to use rebated funds for program purposes beyond the fiscal year of the appropriation charged for the initial payment. Other User fees .--The Committee has included bill language, included in previous appropriations bills, which permits the Office of the Secretary to continue to credit to this account $1,000,000 in user fees. Reductions in fiscal year 1998 appropriations .--In fiscal year 1998, reductions were made to a number of accounts due to limitations or reductions imposed in various areas, such as the Transportation Administration Services Center and the Presidential line-item veto. In the Senate Committee report, each account head shows the amount appropriated in Public Law 105 66 before the various reductions were made. The table below depicts the amount of funds appropriated for each of the accounts, and the reductions required. CHANGES IN FISCAL YEAR 1998 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS Account Public Law 105 66 President's line-item veto Public Law 105 119 Net appropriation Appropriations GP 320 TASC Appropriations transfer from DOS Office of the Secretary: $61,000,000 -$343,000 $60,657,000 ---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- --------------- Subtotal -363,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== U.S. Coast Guard: Operating expenses (includes $300,000,000 for defense-related activities) 2,715,400,000 -529,000 $63,000 2,714,934,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Federal Aviation Administration: Operations 5,301,934,000 -939,000 1,554,000 5,302,549,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Federal Highway Administration: (552,266,000) ( -610,000) (551,656,000) ---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- --------------- Subtotal -657,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: 74,901,000 -81,000 74,820,000 ---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- --------------- Subtotal -178,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Federal Railroad Administration: 20,290,000 -29,000 20,261,000 ---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- --------------- Subtotal -49,000 -5,280,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Federal Transit Administration: 45,738,000 -124,000 45,614,000 ---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- --------------- Subtotal -124,000 -500,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation: Operations and maintenance 11,200,000 -7,000 11,193,000 Research and Special Programs Administration: 28,450,000 -48,000 -450,000 27,952,000 ---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- --------------- Subtotal -92,000 -450,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Office of the Inspector General: Salaries and expenses 42,000,000 -59,000 41,941,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Bureau of Transportation Statistics\1\ (25,000,000) ( -47,000) (24,953,000) ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Surface Transportation Board: Salaries and expenses 13,853,000 -3,000 13,850,000 ================ ============= ================================== =========== =============== Total reductions, Department of Transportation -3,000,000 -6,230,000 1,617,000 \1\BTS reductions in parentheses included under Federal-aid highways. U.S. COAST GUARD SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 1999 PROGRAM The U.S. Coast Guard, as it is known today, was established on January 28, 1915, through the merger of the Revenue Cutter Service and the Lifesaving Service. In 1939, the U.S. Lighthouse Service was transferred to the Coast Guard, followed by the Bureau of Marine Inspection and Navigation in 1942. The Coast Guard has as its primary responsibilities the enforcement of all applicable Federal laws on the high seas and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; promotion of safety of life and property at sea; assistance to navigation; protection of the marine environment; and maintenance of a state of readiness to function as a specialized service in the Navy in time of war (14 U.S.C. 1, 2). The Committee recommends a total program level of $3,959,757,000 for the activities of the Coast Guard in fiscal year 1999. The following table summarizes the Committee's recommendations: [In thousands of dollars] Program Fiscal year-- Committee recommendations 1998 enacted 1999 estimate Operating expenses\1\\2\ 2,715,400 2,771,705 2,761,603 Acquisition, construction, and improvements\3\\4\ 397,850 442,773 388,693 Environmental compliance and restoration 21,000 21,000 21,000 Alteration of bridges 17,000 20,000 Retired pay 653,196 684,000 684,000 Reserve training 67,000 67,000 67,000 Research, development, test, and evaluation 19,000 18,300 17,461 Boat safety 35,000 -------------- --------------- ----------- Total 3,925,446 4,004,778 3,959,757 \1\Excludes reduction for TASC pursuant to section 320 of Public Law 105 66; excludes transfer from Department of State pursuant to Public Law 105 119. \2\Fiscal year 1998 enacted and fiscal year 1999 Committee recommended amount include $300,000,000 in defense discretionary funding; fiscal year 1999 estimate includes $309,000,000, both amounts for national security activities of the Coast Guard and scored against budget function 050 (defense). \3\Includes $9,000,000 for fiscal year 1998 and $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 in proposed asset sales. \4\Fiscal year 1999 estimate includes $35,000,000 in proposed navigation assistance tax fees. OPERATING EXPENSES General Trust Total Appropriations, 1998\1\ $2,690,400,000 $25,000,000 $2,715,400,000 Budget estimate, 1999\2\ 2,746,705,000 25,000,000 2,771,705,000 Committee recommendation\3\ 2,741,603,000 25,000,000 2,761,603,000 Secretary's discretionary transfer authority 60,000,000 60,000,000 ---------------- ------------- ---------------- Total available funds 2,793,603,000 25,000,000 2,821,603,000 \1\Includes $300,000,000 for national security activities scored against budget function 050 (defense). Excludes reductions for TASC pursuant to section 320 of Public Law 105 66; excludes transfer from Department of State pursuant to Public Law 105 119. \2\Includes $309,000,000 for national security activities scored against budget function 050 (defense). \3\Includes $300,000,000 for national security activities scored against budget function 050 (defense). The ``Operating expenses'' appropriation provides funds for the operation and maintenance of multipurpose vessels, aircraft, and shore units strategically located along the coasts and inland waterways of the United States and in selected areas overseas. The program activities of this appropriation fall into the following categories: Search and rescue. --One of its earliest and most traditional missions, the Coast Guard maintains a nationwide system of boats, aircraft, cutters, and rescue coordination centers on 24-hour alert. Aids to navigation. --To help mariners determine their location and avoid accidents, the Coast Guard maintains a network of manned and unmanned aids to navigation along our coasts and on our inland waterways, and operates radio stations in the United States and abroad to serve the needs of the armed services and marine and air commerce. Marine safety. --The Coast Guard insures compliance with Federal statutes and regulations designed to improve safety in the merchant marine industry and operates a recreational boating safety program. Marine environmental protection. --The primary objectives of this program are to minimize the dangers of marine pollution and to assure the safety of U.S. ports and waterways. Enforcement of laws and treaties. --The Coast Guard is the principal maritime enforcement agency with regard to Federal laws on the navigable waters of the United States and the high seas, including fisheries, drug smuggling, illegal immigration, and hijacking of vessels. Ice operations. --In the Arctic and Antarctic, Coast Guard icebreakers escort supply ships, support research activities and Department of Defense operations, survey uncharted waters, and collect scientific data. The Coast Guard also assists commercial vessels through ice-covered waters. Defense readiness. --During peacetime the Coast Guard maintains an effective state of military preparedness to operate as a service in the Navy in time of war or national emergency at the direction of the President. As such the Coast Guard has primary responsibility for the security of ports, waterways, and navigable waters up to 200 miles offshore. COMMITTEE FUNDING RECOMMENDATION The Committee recommendation for Coast Guard operating expenses is $2,761,603,000, including $25,000,000 from the oilspill liability trust fund and $300,000,000 from function 050 for the Coast Guard defense-related activities. The Committee notes that the cost per average FTE for the Coast Guard in the most recent complete fiscal year is $65,560. The anticipated cost per average FTE for fiscal year 1998 is $69,630. The Committee recommendation provides sufficient resources for an average FTE cost greater than that anticipated for fiscal year 1998 at staffing levels above current levels. The Committee also notes that the 5-year FTE experience indicates that the Coast Guard tends to lag behind requested FTE levels. The Committee encourages the Coast Guard to strive to reduce the ratio of officers to enlisted and to report to the Committee by March 1, 1999, on the officer-to-enlisted ratio over the past 10 years with comparable officer-to-enlisted ratios from the other services. [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 enacted\1\ Budget request Committee recommendation Personnel resources: 1,246,767 1,292,406 1,290,029 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, personnel resources 1,702,298 1,762,471 1,752,673 ============================= ================ ========================== Operating funds and unit level maintenance: 114,009 109,563 109,563 District commands: 1st district 37,711 36,831 36,831 7th district 46,400 47,532 47,532 8th district 29,894 30,044 30,044 9th district 18,205 18,583 18,583 13th district 13,749 13,887 13,887 14th district 9,838 10,655 10,655 17th district 20,693 19,805 20,693 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, operating funds and unit level maintenance 617,530 619,593 619,289 ============================= ================ ========================== Depot level maintenance: 154,261 152,391 152,391 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, depot level maintenance 395,106 389,641 389,641 ============================= ================ ========================== Total appropriation 2,714,934 2,771,705 2,761,603 \1\Includes reduction of $529,000,000 for TASC pursuant to section 320 of Public Law 105 66; includes transfer of $63,000,000 from Department of State pursuant to Public Law 105 119. Note.--Fiscal year 1998 enacted and fiscal year 1999 request include $300,000,000 and $309,000,000, respectively, for national security activities, budget function 050 (defense). PERSONNEL RESOURCES Military pay and benefits. --The Coast Guard is to be commended for the progress that has been made over the past several years to streamline and increase the efficiency of the uniformed services. Staffing continues to lag behind recruiting goals, in part because of the competition for qualified individuals that is endemic to the current robust state of the economy. However, the 5-year FTE utilization experience of the Coast Guard indicates that they continue to run behind requested levels and accordingly, the Committee recommends a reduction in the FTE levels and a commensurate reduction in the military pay and benefits request. The Committee also notes that the streamlining effort has not yet been fully reflected throughout the ranks and trusts that the Commandant will continue to pursue the streamlining efforts of his predecessor and seek a ratio of officers to enlisted personnel consistent with the other armed services and the unique nature of the Coast Guard's multiple mission requirements. International engagement in Caribbean. --The Committee has not included funding for the mobile, ship-based support and training buoy tender platform as requested in the budget, without prejudice. Although this may be a worthwhile foreign policy initiative, the budgetary constraints already facing the Coast Guard make such an addition to the Coast Guard's mission profile an unwarranted diversion of operating funding from other critical missions. Military health care .--The Committee has provided $121,800,000 for military health care, an increase of $2,399,000 over fiscal year 1998 levels. The Committee supports the Alaska Federal Health Care Partnership's proposal to develop an Alaska-wide telemedicine network to provide access to health services and health education information in remote areas of Alaska to the more than 200,000 Federal beneficiaries now living or stationed in Alaska, including more than 3,000 Coast Guard beneficiaries. The partnership, a joint effort of the Coast Guard, Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Indian Health Service will create 235 telemedicine health care access sites at Coast Guard, DOD, VA and IHS clinical facilities throughout Alaska linking remote installations and villages with tertiary health facilities located in Anchorage and Fairbanks over a 4-year period and should serve as a model for the use of telemedicine technology for the delivery of health care services and health care education in remote settings. The Committee has provided funding for the Coast Guard to participate in the partnership's Alaska telemedicine project. Training and education .--The recruiting and training support category has several subsets, including recruiting, training centers (Yorktown, VA; Petaluma, CA; and Cape May, NJ), the Coast Guard Academy, and professional training and education. The Committee has provided $65,012,000 consistent with the budget request. The Committee believes that the Coast Guard has done a good job in trying to hold costs down, and though its budget for professional training and education is sizable, further cuts are not necessary at this time and would undermine the Coast Guard's efforts to recruit and train to meet personnel needs in a streamlined Coast Guard. OPERATING FUNDS AND UNIT LEVEL MAINTENANCE BILL LANGUAGE National security .--The Committee's recommendation includes $300,000,000 from the defense function for Coast Guard support of national security activities. The Coast Guard plays a key role in support of military missions under the U.S. Atlantic and Southern Commands in support of drug interdiction missions, refugee and immigration support, and enforcement and joint military training. The Coast Guard is a cost-effective force which is multimissioned. Its ships, aircraft, shore units, and people have four primary roles: maritime safety, maritime law enforcement, marine environmental protection, and national defense. These roles are complementary and contribute to the Coast Guard's unique niche within the national security community. The value of the Coast Guard forces and their mission experience was clearly evident by their active participation in Operations Desert Shield/Storm in the Persian Gulf, and more recently, in Operation Desert Thunder in the Persian Gulf and Operations Restore/Uphold Democracy in Haiti. The Coast Guard is one of the five Armed Forces, and is a full partner on the joint national security team. To be a credible partner, the Coast Guard must maintain a high state of operational readiness. Many parts of the Coast Guard's budget contain funding requests that, if cut, would severely impair the Coast Guard's operational readiness and, therefore, its ability to meet national security commitments. GENERAL PROVISIONS Vessel traffic safety fairway, Santa Barbara/San Francisco .--The Committee has included a general provision (sec. 313) that would prohibit funds to plan, finalize, or implement regulations establishing a vessel traffic safety fairway which is less than 5 miles wide between the Santa Barbara vessel traffic separation scheme and the San Francisco vessel traffic separation scheme. This language has been included in previous appropriations bills. OTHER Mackinaw .--The bill includes funding for continued operation and maintenance of the icebreaking cutter Mackinaw during fiscal year 1999. Drug interdiction activities .--The Committee has provided the requested $369,000,000 for the war on drugs. It should be left to the Commandant's discretion how the drug interdiction activities funding is to be distributed; however, the Committee believes that this area is perfectly suited for application of performance measures and evaluation of program impacts. Global marine distress signal system [GMDSS] .--The Committee is concerned with potential problems with the implementation of the global marine distress signal system [GMDSS]. The Federal Communications Commission [FCC] has adopted regulations that will require GMDSS units to be installed on all vessels, including fishing vessels, over 300 tons. This is intended to replace ship-to-ship emergency communications with an automated ship-to-shore system. Several problems exist with the GMDSS concept as it would be applied. One of the most serious problems would be that vessels carrying GMDSS equipment would no longer be required to monitor other communications channels including those most frequently used by fishing vessels. Most successful rescues are performed by other nearby commercial vessels, and under this new regime, the distressed vessel would have to rely on the Coast Guard to direct nearby vessels to the incident site. This will cause an unnecessary delay in response and could substantially degrade current levels of safety. Other potential problems include: (1) whether new shore-based stations will provide adequate listening coverage for all parts of the Bering Sea; (2) cost per vessel of installing the new equipment; (3) lack of adequate training for system operators; and (4) whether manufacturers of GMDSS equipment are capable of supplying the number of units that will be required by February 1, 1999. The Committee directs the Commandant to ensure that the Coast Guard's mission to ensure the safety of life at sea is not compromised by the new GMDSS requirements and to report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations on what actions, if any, are necessary to provide this assurance. Marine Fire and Safety Association .--The Committee remains supportive of efforts by the Marine Fire and Safety Association [MFSA] to provide specialized firefighting training and maintain an oilspill response contingency plan for the Columbia River. The Committee encourages the Secretary to provide funding for MFSA consistent with the authorization and directs the Secretary to provide $178,000 to continue efforts by the nonprofit organization comprised of numerous fire departments on both sides of the Columbia River. The funding will be utilized to provide specialized communications, firefighting training and equipment, and to implement the oilspill response contingency plan for the Columbia River. Seasonal rescue capability. --The Committee remains concerned about maintaining critically important Coast Guard air rescue response time in the New York City area during the peak boating season. Therefore, the Committee directs the Coast Guard to establish and operate a seasonal air facility in the New York City area to provide helicopter rescue capability during the period April 15 through October 15. Container Inspection Program. --The Committee recommended funding level includes $1,191,000 for the restoration of the Container Inspection Program. The Committee rejects the request to downsize the Coast Guard container inspection work force and has provided sufficient funds to maintain the inspector work force at the fiscal year 1998 level. Testimony by the Commandant before the Committee indicates that, while the Coast Guard proposal is presented as a reduction solely to the container inspector work force, the actual effect of the reduction would be to cut personnel who are devoting a majority of their time to other critical marine safety functions at the direction of the captain of the port. As such, the proposed reduction, rather than serving to reduce only container inspections, would effectively reduce numerous other critical marine safety activities. These activities include the inspection of tankships and waterfront facilities handling crude oil, petroleum products and hazardous materials for compliance with safety and pollution prevention regulations; the inspection of foreign flag vessels under the Port State Control Program for protection of U.S. ports and harbors from the hazards posed by poorly maintained and unseaworthy vessels; the timely response to pollution incidents and oversight of pollution cleanup activities; and the performance of periodic shoreside and waterborne harbor patrols for law enforcement, port risk assessment and identification of potential safety hazards. The Committee continues to view the Container Inspection Program as a critical marine safety task and an important component of the Coast Guard's port safety mission, especially in light of the continued growth in containerized cargo entering U.S. ports. Ballast water management program .--The Committee recommended funding level includes $2,000,000 to implement the nationwide ballast water management program. USCG Station Rockaway, NY .--The Committee directs the Coast Guard to provide, on a quarterly basis, a report to the Appropriations Committees on the status of a readiness and manpower capability of the Rockaway, NY, U.S. Coast Guard Station. Secretary's discretionary transfer authority .--The bill includes language that permits the Secretary to transfer up to $60,000,000 from Federal Aviation Administration operations to Coast Guard operating expenses for the purpose of providing additional funds for drug interdiction activities. User fees .--The bill includes language that prohibits the planning, finalization, or implementation of any regulation that would promulgate new maritime user fees not specifically authorized by law after the date of enactment of this act. ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND IMPROVEMENTS General Trust Total Appropriations, 1998\1\ $377,850,000 $20,000,000 $397,850,000 Budget estimate, 1999\2\ 422,773,000 20,000,000 442,773,000 Committee recommendation 366,093,000 20,000,000 388,693,000 \1\Includes $9,000,000 in asset sales. \2\Includes $1,000,000 in asset sales and $35,000,000 in proposed navigation assistance fees. This appropriation provides for the major acquisition, construction, and improvement of vessels, aircraft, shore units, and aids to navigation operated and maintained by the Coast Guard. Currently, the Coast Guard has in operation approximately 250 cutters, ranging in size from 65-foot tugs to 399-foot polar icebreakers, more than 2,000 boats, and an inventory of more than 200 helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. The Coast Guard also operates approximately 600 stations, support and supply centers, communications facilities, and other shore units. The Coast Guard provides over 48,000 navigational aids--buoys, fixed aids, lighthouses, and radio navigational stations. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The following table summarizes the Committee's programmatic recommendations: [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 enacted\1\ Fiscal year 1999 estimate\2\ Committee recommendation Vessels 212,100 269,573 215,473 Aircraft 25,800 37,131 46,131 Other equipment 44,650 33,969 35,389 Shore facilities and aids to navigation 68,300 53,650 43,250 Personnel and related support 47,000 48,450 48,450 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------- Total 397,850 442,773 388,693 \1\Includes $9,000,000 in asset sales. \2\Includes $1,000,000 in asset sales and $35,000,000 in proposed navigation assistance fees. VESSELS The Committee recommends $215,473,000 for vessel acquisition and improvement. The projected allocation of these funds is shown in the table below: VESSELS [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1999 estimate Committee recommendation Acquire vessels and equipment: 105,000 45,000 Stern loading buoy boat replacement 11,773 11,773 Survey and design--cutters and boats 500 500 Mackinaw replacement 4,000 ATS 1 conversion 10,000 14,000 Surface search radar replacement project 12,900 12,900 Deepwater capability replacement 28,000 28,000 Repair, renovate, or improve existing vessels and small boats: 3,800 3,800 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total (new program level) 269,573 215,473 Seagoing buoy tender [WLB] replacement .--The Coast Guard is in the process of replacing its 50-year-old fleet of seagoing buoy tenders with up to 16 new tenders. The request of $105,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 is to pay for the award of two ships under the full production contract, and to cover additional costs such as spare parts, logistics, and project administration. According to recent estimates, the contract for the first two production ships will be awarded no earlier than the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1998. The Committee continues to be concerned about the growing carryover balances in this program. Last year, the Committee maintained the funding in this account pursuant to the belief that the Coast Guard would be able to obligate a substantial portion of the funds. To date, that has not happened. In addition, this program is of concern to the Committee due to the increasing program administration costs, the vacillating sail-away costs, and the current unobligated balance. The Coast Guard estimates that the third and fourth vessels in the procurement cost a total of $65,000,000. The current request for two vessels under the anticipated full production procurement contract is $105,000,000. The cost escalation of this vessel procurement is of great concern to the Committee, and accordingly, the Committee recommends a reduction of $60,000,000 to the request. When combined with the unobligated balances, the program funding level should be sufficient to award a contract for two vessels at the average cost of the initial procurement assuming the cost profiles for the procurement remain stable for more than a couple of months. The Committee understands that the contract is structured for a minimum of two ships in fiscal year 1999. The Committee's intent is to provide sufficient funds for the Coast Guard to contract for the two vessels at a reasonable price and, at the same time, clear any unobligated balances associated with the program. The Coast Guard shall provide an analysis of the proposed procurement to the Committee prior to the obligation of these funds including an estimate of the cost of the complete procurement to fill the requirement for seagoing buoy tenders. Coastal buoy tender [WLM] replacement .--The Committee has provided $31,000,000 for the coastal buoy tender replacement program. This program replaces the Coast Guard's existing 133-foot and 157-foot coastal buoy tenders with 14 new ships. The Coast Guard's request of $31,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 is for economic price adjustments, change orders, logistics, and administration. All 14 ships have been ordered. Coastal patrol boat/82-foot WPB replacement .--The Committee has provided $37,600,000 for the coastal patrol boat replacement program. This program would replace the 82-foot coastal patrol boats which are over 30 years old. The $37,600,000 request for fiscal year 1999 was to procure eight new boats. The Committee had hoped to procure additional CPB's by exercising existing options to provide the Coast Guard increased flexibility in asset deployment at an earlier date than under the current procurement schedule, but budgetary constraints make that impracticable at this time. The CPB is one of the more versatile vessels in the Coast Guard inventory and should provide increased flexibility and capability as the Coast Guard transitions from the current fleet mix and recapitalizes the fleet. Stern loading buoy boat replacement project .--The Committee recommendation provides the entire Coast Guard request of $11,773,000 in fiscal year 1999 to procure eight new buoy boats. Mackinaw replacement .--The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for concept exploration to refine the specifications and costs for a heavy icebreaking replacement vessel, including a new multimission vessel, for the 53-year-old Mackinaw . While the Committee is pleased that the Coast Guard committed to the continued operation of the Mackinaw to maintain heavy icebreaking capabilities on the Great Lakes, the Committee is concerned about the long lead time projected by the Coast Guard to receive a replacement vessel when the Coast Guard has been studying this issue for a number of years, and projects that a replacement vehicle would not be available until the year 2006. The funding provided in the bill will prevent another year's delay in the acquisition process for a replacement heavy icebreaking vessel. The Committee expects the Coast Guard to issue an interim status report on the concept exploration to the Committee by January 31, 1999. ATS 1 conversion .--The Committee recommends $14,000,000 for conversion and the addition of a flight deck. Deepwater capability replacement.-- The Committee has provided $28,000,000 consistent with the budget request. The Committee is concerned with the aggressive and novel approach envisioned by the Coast Guard in the deepwater capability study and procurement and notes that the Coast Guard and the Department have a history of difficulty with large complex procurements or asset modifications. The deepwater procurement promises to be the most complex and potentially controversial of procurements that the Coast Guard has managed. Accordingly, the Committee directs the Coast Guard to report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee prior to the downselection concerning the anticipated number of project teams, the anticipated role of the Government team, and the anticipated schedule for final contract award. The Committee encourages the Department and the Coast Guard to structure the procurement to provide the greatest possible flexibility for the procurement, cost competitiveness, and diversity of approach for meeting the deepwater mission requirements. The Committee is concerned about the inclusion of a Presidential advisory council on Coast Guard roles and missions as part of the Deepwater capability replacement analysis justification. The justification indicated that the council would convene in early 1998, but as of June 10, 1998, the Committee had not been made aware of the formulation of such a council, much less any meetings. Before any funds are committed to initiate such a roles and mission review council, the Committee expects to be briefed on the expected composition of any such proposed council, the charter for any such council, and the anticipated timetable for completion of such a review. The Committee is concerned that too much time has elapsed in fiscal year 1998 for the initiation of such a review to have any meaningful contribution to the fiscal year 1999 appropriations process and accordingly, directs that funding for such a review council be requested in the fiscal year 2000 budget submission. Polar class icebreaker reliability improvement project [RIP]. --The Comittee recommends $4,000,000 for this project and reiterates the cost overrun and project management concerns noted in the fiscal year 1998 conference report. AIRCRAFT For aircraft procurement, the Committee recommends $46,131,000. Funds for aircraft acquisitions are distributed as follows: AIRCRAFT [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1999 estimate Committee recommendation HC 130 engine upgrade 9,941 9,941 HH 65A helicopter kapton rewiring 4,500 4,500 HH 65A engine control program 9,000 Long range search aircraft capability preservation 1,590 1,590 HH 65A helicopter mission unit computer unit replacement 3,000 3,000 HC 130 aircraft sensor upgrade 11,000 11,000 HU 25 aircraft avionics improvements 3,500 3,500 HH 60J navigation upgrade 1,100 1,100 HC 130 side looking airborne radar [SLAR] 2,500 2,500 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 37,131 46,131 HH 65A performance limitations. --The Committee understands that there are a large number of mission situations where the combination of current mission weight requirements, fuel load, temperature, altitude, and sea state must be traded off with mission range, on-station time, and shipboard operations. A full authority digital electronic control [FADEC] engine control program, currently anticipated as a life cycle cost reduction and safety initiative in fiscal year 2000, is an essential initial step to restoring power margins on the HH 65. The Committee recommends $9,000,000 to initiate the FADEC program a year early and to initiate any associated engine upgrade engineering efforts required to facilitate a cost-effective power upgrade program. The Committee further requests the Coast Guard to provide a description of the limitations and tradeoffs mentioned above, with relevant measures of how frequently power limitations restrict the HH 65 below original Coast Guard requirements and the impact of such limitations. Further, the Committee requests the Coast Guard to provide a plan to restore needed power margins while accommodating past and future weight growth over the second half of the HH 65's useful life. Please provide this report by March 1, 1999. OTHER EQUIPMENT The Committee recommends $35,389,000. The following table displays the project allocations: OTHER EQUIPMENT [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1999 estimate Committee recommendation Fleet logistics system [FLS] 4,669 4,669 Ports and waterways safety system [PAWSS] 6,600 5,500 Marine information for safety and law enforcement [MISLE] 6,100 4,000 Local notices to mariners [LNM] automation 1,300 1,000 Defense message system [DMS] impementation 800 800 Communication system [COMMSYS] 2000 2,000 1,000 Differential global positioning system [DGPS] 2,600 9,520 Personnel management information system/joint uniform military pay system II 1,900 1,900 Aviation logistics management information system [ALMIS] 1,000 1,000 National distress system modernization 3,000 2,000 Commercial satellite communication upgrade 4,000 4,000 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 33,969 35,389 Ports and waterways safety system [PAWSS] .--The Committee recommends $5,500,000 for the development and implementation of a new ports and waterways safety system [PAWSS], the same level appropriated for fiscal year 1998. The Committee continues to be interested in Coast Guard activities to develop a new approach to navigation safety, with an emphasis on streamlining and reducing the cost of such safety systems. The Committee applauds the Coast Guard's efforts to develop such a system in cooperation with the maritime community and to apply information technology. Marine information for safety and law enforcement [MISLE]. --The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for this activity, the same level appropriated for fiscal year 1998. Local notices to mariners [LNM] automation .--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for this activity, the same level appropriated for fiscal year 1998. Communications system [COMMSYS] 2000 .--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for this activity, the same level appropriated for fiscal year 1998. Nationwide differential GPS .--The Committee recommends $9,520,000 for this activity, $6,920,000 more than requested. The Committee directs the Coast Guard to use the additional funds provided to accelerate the Coast Guard's electronic equipment procurement, site preparation and construction work, and installation of conversion software at 33 Air Force groundwave emergency network [GWEN] transmitter sites, in order to convert these sites as quickly as possible to differential global positioning system transmitter sites. The Committee is convinced that the most reasonable way to proceed with the Department of Transportation's Nationwide Differential Global Positioning System [NDGPS] Program is to establish the DGPS transmitters in the fastest, most cost-effective manner possible. The Committee also understands that the Air Force may release the GWEN system in approximately 1 year, and economies of scale can be realized by accelerating the program at this point beyond the requested funding level. The Committee did not include NDGPS funds requested in either the Federal Highway Administration or within the Federal Railroad Administration budgets, but is supportive of the NDGPS effort, and wants to see the program carried out in a expeditious and logical manner. The funds provided will pay for the costs associated with converting a minimum of 33 GWEN sites that are currently in the optimal location for NDGPS service, and for the personnel costs associated with four installers. Personnel management information system .--The Committee has provided the full amount requested. National distress system modernization .--The Committee recommends a reduction of $1,000,000 below the requested level to $2,000,000. The Committee believes the Coast Guard can complete the activities anticipated for fiscal year 1999 in this program within the reduced funding level. SHORE FACILITIES AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION The program level recommended is $43,250,000. SHORE FACILITIES AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1999 estimate Committee recommendation Shore--General: 5,000 5,000 Shore--Air stations: 1,500 1,500 Shore--Centers/groups/stations: 1,450 1,450 Aids to navigation facilities: Waterways aids-to-navigation projects 5,000 5,000 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 53,650 43,250 Minor AC&I shore construction projects .--The recommended funding level includes funding for the Thatcher's Island, MA, boat launchway. Coast Guard housing. --The Committee recommends the Coast Guard reprogram prior unobligated balances in this account. The Department of Transportation inspector general has reported that there are in excess of $16,000,000 in projects that cannot be obligated. Station Dauphin Island. --The Committee recommends $3,200,000 for improvements to Station Dauphin Island. The improvements will permit the Coast Guard to station assets almost an hour closer to the most heavily utilized boating and fishing areas. PERSONNEL AND RELATED SUPPORT The program level recommended is $48,450,000. Within the amount provided, $750,000 shall be for core acquisition costs. The Committee has provided the full amount requested for AC&I personnel and related support. [In thousands of dollars] Personnel and related support Fiscal year 1999 estimate Committee recommendation Direct personnel costs 47,700 47,700 Core acquisition costs 750 750 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 48,450 48,450 BILL LANGUAGE Asset sales .--The bill includes a provision which would credit the proceeds from the sale or lease of surplus Coast Guard real property to this appropriation. The administration requested this authority which allows asset sale revenues to be credited to this appropriation as offsetting collections, but limits the amount of offsetting collections in fiscal year 1999 to $1,000,000. Any excess proceeds from asset sales would accrue to the following fiscal year. The Committee would like the Coast Guard's estimate of properties of high value in the Coast Guard's real property portfolio; therefore, the Coast Guard is directed to submit to the Committee by March 1, 1999, an updated list of its 25 most valuable properties. This list should include information on the fair market value of each property (or an estimate thereof), the amount of land and the number of buildings, the current use being made of the property, and the annual operating costs for the activities housed on each property. The Coast Guard needs funding it can depend upon to carry out necessary projects. The Senate supports the authority vested in the Commandant which allows the sale of real property and specified operational assets, with proceeds to be credited to the ``Acquisition, construction, and improvements'' appropriation. The Coast Guard and FAA, like many other agencies, are reorganizing and downsizing while providing critical services to the public at less cost. The Committee believes that the Coast Guard, the FAA, the FHWA, and the Government as a whole, would benefit substantially if allowed budgetary credit for property they expect to excess as part of downsizing efforts. Clearly, there is the potential for a very positive benefit if the Coast Guard and the FAA are permitted to receive credit for the value of excessed property. Pier space use agreement .--The bill includes language that allows the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Commandant of the Coast Guard, to enter into a long-term use agreement with the city of Homer for dedicated pier space on the municipal dock. This authority is necessary to support Coast Guard vessels when such vessels call on Homer, AK. The terms and conditions of the use agreement shall be developed by the Secretary and the city of Homer. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION Appropriations, 1998 $21,000,000 Budget estimate, 1999 21,000,000 Committee recommendation 21,000,000 The Committee recommends funding of $21,000,000 to continue the environmental restoration and compliance-related actions throughout the Coast Guard. These fiscal year 1999 funds will be used to address environmental problems at former and current Coast Guard units as required by applicable Federal, State, and local environmental laws and regulations. Planned expenditures for these funds include major upgrades to petroleum and regulated-substance storage tanks, restoration of contaminated ground water and soils, remediation efforts at hazardous substance disposal sites, and initial site surveys and actions necessary to bring Coast Guard shore facilities and vessels into compliance with environmental laws and regulations. ALTERATION OF BRIDGES (highway trust fund) Appropriations, 1998 $17,000,000 Budget estimate, 1999 (\1\) Committee recommendation (highway trust fund) 20,000,000 \1\The budget estimate proposes that the cost of altering bridges will become eligible for funding from Federal-aid highways. The ``Alteration of bridges'' appropriation provides funds for the Coast Guard's share of the cost of altering or removing bridges obstructive to navigation. Under the provisions of the Truman-Hobbs Act of June 21, 1940, as amended (33 U.S.C. 511 et seq.), the Coast Guard, as the Federal Government's agent, is required to share with owners the cost of altering railroad and publicly owned highway bridges which obstruct the free movement of navigation on navigable waters of the United States in accordance with the formula established in 33 U.S.C. 516. The Committee directs that, of the funds provided, $3,000,000 shall be allocated to the Florida Avenue railroad/highway combination bridge in New Orleans, LA; $7,000,000 to the Sidney Lanier highway bridge in Brunswick, GA; $2,000,000 to the John F. Limehouse Bridge in Charleston, SC; $1,000,000 to the Chelsea Street Bridge in Boston, MA; $5,000,000 to the highway 90 bridge in Pascagoula, MS; and $2,000,000 to the Mississippi River bridge in Greenville, MS. RETIRED PAY Appropriations, 1998 (mandatory) $653,196,000 Budget estimate, 1999 (mandatory) 684,000,000 Committee recommendation (mandatory) 684,000,000 The ``Retired pay'' appropriation provides for retired pay of military personnel of the Coast Guard and Coast Guard Reserve, members of the former Lighthouse Service, and for annuities payable to beneficiaries of retired military personnel under the retired serviceman's family protection plan (10 U.S.C. 1431 1446) and survivor benefit plan (10 U.S.C. 1447 1455), and for medical care of retired personnel and their dependents under the Dependents Medical Care Act. The average number of personnel on the retired rolls is estimated to be 32,633 in fiscal year 1999, as compared with an estimated 31,462 in fiscal year 1998 and 30,478 in fiscal year 1997. The budget estimate proposed indefinite budget authority instead of a fixed amount. RESERVE TRAINING Appropriations, 1998 $67,000,000 Budget estimate, 1999 67,000,000 Committee recommendation 67,000,000 Under the provisions of 14 U.S.C. 145, the Secretary of Transportation is required to adequately support the development and training of a Reserve force to ensure that the Coast Guard will be sufficiently organized, manned, and equipped to fully perform its wartime missions. The purpose of the Reserve training program is to provide trained units and qualified persons for active duty in the Coast Guard in time of war or national emergency, or at such other times as the national security requires. Coast Guard reservists must also train for mobilization assignments that are unique to the Coast Guard in times of war, such as port security operations associated with the Coast Guard's Maritime Defense Zone [MDZ] mission and include deployable port security units. The Coast Guard is provided Reserve training funding as follows: [In thousands of dollars] Functional program element Fiscal year 1998 levels President's request (7,600 SELRES) Committee recommendation (8,000 SELRES) Initial training 3,341 2,466 2,466 Continuing training 39,827 40,820 40,820 Operation and maintenance support 15,074 15,374 15,374 Program management and administration 8,758 8,340 8,340 ------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- Total 67,000 67,000 67,000 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION General Trust Total Appropriations, 1998 $15,500,000 $3,500,000 $19,000,000 Budget estimate, 1999 14,800,000 3,500,000 18,300,000 Committee recommendation 13,961,000 3,500,000 17,461,000 The Coast Guard's Research and Development Program seeks to improve the tools and techniques with which Coast Guard carries out its varied operational missions and to increase the knowledge base upon which it depends to fulfill its regulatory responsibilities. The Committee recommendation includes $17,461,000 for research, development, test, and evaluation distributed as follows: [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 Fiscal year 1999 estimate Committee recommendation Program areas: 1,875 1,250 1,250 ------------------ --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 19,000 18,300 17,461 \1\Project areas discussed in the servicewide safety and environmental compliance; command, control, communication, computers, and intelligence integration; and technology advancement and assessment budget in the fiscal year 1998 request have been consolidated into a single budget sheet (technology investment) for the fiscal year 1999 budget submission. The Committee has provided $17,461,000 for fiscal year 1999 research and development. Waterways safety and management. --The Committee recommends $1,225,000 for this activity, the same level appropriated in fiscal year 1998. Marine safety. --The Committee recommends $2,995,000 for this activity, the same level appropriated in fiscal year 1998. Marine environmental protection. --The Committee recommends $2,704,000 for this activity, including $1,000,000 for further invasive species research efforts. Within the funds provided, the Coast Guard is directed to provide an assessment of the applicability of previously developed antisubmarine acoustic-monitoring technology for application in the identification and capture of drug traffickers in high volume maritime transit zones. BOAT SAFETY (aquatic resources trust fund) Appropriations, 1998 $35,000,000 Budget estimate, 1999\1\ ........................... Committee recommendation ........................... \1\President's budget requests $55,000,000 in mandatory appropriations in fiscal year 1999. This account provides financial assistance for a coordinated National Recreational Boating Safety Program for the several States. Title 46, United States Code, section 13106, establishes a ``Boat safety'' account from which the Secretary may allocate and distribute matching funds to assist in the development, administration, and financing of qualifying State programs. The ``Boat safety'' account consists of amounts transferred from the highway trust fund which are derived from the motorboat fuel tax (18.4 cents per gallon). The President's budget requests no discretionary funding for 1999. Instead, the President's budget proposes to provide all funding for the State boating safety grant program by providing $55,000,000 from the aquatic resources trust fund. The Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century provides for a guaranteed funding level of $55,000,000 annually for this program. No additional appropriations are necessary for fiscal year 1999. General Provisions Land conveyance, Coast Guard Station Ocracoke. --The Committee has included language section 334 permitting the transfer of Coast Guard Station Ocracoke to the State of North Carolina. Transportation of edible oils .--The Committee has included a general provision (sec. 341) that requires the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate a regulation not later than March 31, 1999, that is consistent with the Edible Oil Regulatory Reform Act, to specifically address facilities that handle animal fats and vegetable oils by amending 33 CFR part 154, which relates to response plans for marine-transportation related facilities. To be consistent, a rule for animal fats and for vegetable oils should include, at a minimum, separate definitions, a separate category from other oils, and provide requirements that are specific to and appropriate for animal fats and vegetable oils. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 1999 PROGRAM The Federal Aviation Administration traces its origins to the Air Commerce Act of 1926, but more recently to the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 which established the independent Federal Aviation Agency from functions which had resided in the Airways Modernization Board, the Civil Aeronautics Administration, and parts of the Civil Aeronautics Board. FAA became an administration of the Department of Transportation on April 1, 1967, pursuant to the Department of Transportation Act (October 15, 1966). The total recommended program level for the FAA for fiscal year 1999 amounts to $9,899,569,269 including $43,000,000 in user fees credited to the ``Operations'' appropriation and a $2,100,000,000 obligation limitation on the use of contract authority for the Airport Grants Program. The following table summarizes the Committee's recommendations: [In thousands of dollars] Program Fiscal year-- Committee recommendation 1998 enacted 1999 budget estimate Operations \1\5,335,934 5,631,130 5,581,259 Facilities and equipment \2\1,875,477 2,130,000 2,044,683 Research, engineering, and development 199,183 290,000 173,627 Grants-in-aid for airports 1,700,000 1,700,000 2,100,000 -------------- ---------------------- ----------- Total 9,110,594 9,751,130 9,899,569 \1\Excludes reduction for TASC pursuant to section 320 of Public Law 105 66; excludes transfer of $1,554,000 from Department of State pursuant to Public Law 105 119. \2\Excludes $25,000,000 supplemental Public Law 105 174. OPERATIONS General Trust User fees Total Appropriations, 1998\1\ $3,400,306,000 $1,901,628,000 $5,301,934,000 Budget estimate, 1999 3,528,130,000 2,060,000,000 $43,000,000 5,631,130,000 Committee recommendation 3,379,328,885 2,158,930,135 43,000,000 5,581,259,000 \1\Excludes reduction of $939,000 for TASC pursuant to Public Law 105 66; excludes transfer of $1,554,000 from Department of State pursuant to Public Law 105 119; includes $50,000,000 transferred to EAS Program. FAA's ``Operations'' appropriation provides funds for the operation, maintenance, communications, and logistic support of the air traffic control and navigation systems and activities. It also covers the administration and management of the regulatory, airports, commercial space, medical and engineering, and development programs. User fees. --The administration proposed collecting $93,000,000 in user fees in fiscal year 1999. These fees were to be available without Appropriations Committee action, including $50,000,000 for the essential air service program and rural airport safety and $43,000,000 for FAA expenses. The FAA cost allocation methodology, which the U.S. Court of Appeals cited as a critical deficiency in the court's decision to invalidate the schedule of overflight user fees, is scheduled to be operative during July 1998. Accordingly, the FAA has not appealed the court of appeals decision and the Committee assumes that FAA intends to reissue a fee schedule that comports with the court of appeals decision. The Committee further assumes that the FAA will adhere to prior congressional guidance as a new schedule of fees is formulated. Operations.-- The activities of the operations accounts comprise eight main areas consistent with FAA's reorganization to bring together functions and activities that support the provision of a single, major service and to establish a single executive responsible for that service. Air traffic services. --Provides for the operations and maintenance of the national air traffic control and navigation system and the installation of air traffic and navigation equipment. Air traffic services consists of five subactivities: air traffic, NAS logistics, systems maintenance, leased telecommunications, and flight inspections. Aviation regulation and certification.-- Promotes aviation safety and ensures compliance with safety and certification standards for air carriers, commercial operators, air agencies, airmen, and civil aircraft, including aircraft registration; develops and administers safety standards for airworthiness of aircraft and components. Includes accident investigation, aviation medicine, aviation rulemaking, and the suspected unapproved parts office. Aviation security .--Provides for the overall planning, direction, management, evaluation, and enforcement of civil aviation security; supports efforts covering the investigation and interdiction of illegal drugs and the assessment of foreign airports. Research and acquisition.-- Responsible for all research, prototyping, system development, and acquisition activities. Includes the William J. Hughes Technical Center. Administration of airports. --Provides for the administration of airport grants and the safety inspection and certification of the Nation's airports. Commercial space transportation. --Facilitates and promotes commercial space launches by the U.S. private sector and licenses and regulates commercial launches, launch site operations, and certain payloads. Administration. --Funds the administrative functions that establish policy and direct and develop programs in the areas of FAA aircraft use and management, building space management, budget and accounting, business information and consultation, human resource management, and technical and management training; includes the regional administrators and the Aeronautical Center Director. Staff offices. --Funds the Office of the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator, and offices that report directly to the Administrator and provide executive direction; operations and communications control; civil rights; government and industry affairs; policy, planning, and international aviation; legal counsel; and public affairs. The bill includes $5,538,259,000 for the operations activities of the Federal Aviation Administration, of which $2,158,930,135 shall be derived from the airport and airway trust fund. As in past years, FAA is directed to report immediately to the Committees on Appropriations in the event resources are insufficient to operate a safe and effective air traffic control system. The following table summarizes the Committee's recommendation in comparison to the budget estimate: [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year-- Committee recommendations 1998 program level\1\\2\ 1999 budget estimate Air traffic services 4,153,106 4,380,866 4,325,866 Aviation regulation and certification 609,879 636,027 624,879 Aviation security 97,479 128,821 111,429 Research and acquisition 92,340 94,202 92,340 Administration of airports 47,891 49,854 47,891 Commercial space transportation 6,168 6,275 6,168 Administration 256,493 259,014 256,493 Staff offices 73,193 76,071 73,193 Accountwide adjustments ----------- -------------------------- ----------------------- Total 5,336,549 5,631,130 5,538,259 ========================== ======================= =========== User fees 84,000 43,000 43,000 Appropriated funds 5,252,549 5,588,130 5,538,259 Secretary's discretionary transfer authority 60,000 -------------------------- ----------------------- ----------- Total available funds 5,252,549 5,631,130 5,641,259 \1\Includes $939,000 reduction for TASC pursuant to section 320 of Public Law 105 66. Includes $1,554,000 transfer from Department of State pursuant to Public Law 105 119. \2\Excludes $23,000,000 available balances of the $57,700,000 provided in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, Public Law 104 208. AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES The Committee recommends a total of $4,325,866,000 for the operation and maintenance of the national air traffic control and flight service system. The Committee is confident that this level is completely sufficient for air traffic services and offers the following analysis for illustration of the flexibility represented by the Committee's recommendation. The requirements for funding for this activity could be predicated on a series of adjustments to the fiscal year 1998 appropriated level. Initially, the appropriation could be adjusted downward for the $93,000,000 in overflight fees that were not forthcoming in fiscal year 1998 but are anticipated for fiscal year 1999. The Administrator and the Secretary have both indicated that the FAA has been able to maintain a safe air traffic control environment notwithstanding the inability to access the revenues that would have come from these fees. Second, the appropriation should be reduced by $10,994,000 requested for WAAS operations activities consistent with the treatment of the WAAS Program in the F&E account. In addition, over $23,000,000 in this appropriation is directly attributable to 248 controller staff-years that are solely committed to union activities and over $15,000,000 that is directly attributable to overtime staffing. For a great deal of the amount of time overtime is authorized, a union controller representative is also scheduled--but only for union activities. Given the high level of staff-years committed to union activities viewed in conjunction with the seemingly unalterable trend for substantial reliance on overtime staffing, the Committee encourages the Federal Aviation Administration to pursue greater flexibility in staffing arrangements to reduce the current reliance on overtime and to encourage the conduct of union activities in nonpeak air traffic control periods. It does not seem unreasonable to the Committee that union activities might be best conducted during the slower traffic period and that union representatives might best serve the union membership by conducting union activities while the bulk of the controllers (and presumably the union representatives as well) are not engaged in the heavier traffic flows. While the Committee does not recommend reducing the appropriation by the amount attributable to the overtime staffing and the seemingly suboptimal timing of the generous allotment of staff-years for union activities, or interim incentive pay, or even adjusting the base to reflect the actual fiscal year 1998 baseline, the FAA should pursue efficiencies that would result from a greater coordination of activities in this area. Further, the Committee notes that the FAA forecasting of aviation activity has tended to be overly optimistic. In the Independent Financial Assessment, Coopers & Lybrand noted: The FAA has a solid reputation in the aviation community for its forecasting abilities. However, when comparing actual past activity to 5-year historical projections, the FAA has consistently overestimated future aviation activity. Five-year projections are of particular importance in assessing the FAA's financial requirements as it takes 3 to 5 years to fully train a new controller. Overestimates in the need for new controllers 5 years from now will likely lead to significant future expenditures for unnecessary resources. It is also important because the Federal budget process begins at least 2\1/2\ years before the end of the particular fiscal year. Interviews with FAA staff have indicated that these long-term overestimations are principally caused by the economic projections provided by OMB, as these projections generally do not take economic cycles into account. OMB's projections are used as the basis for the FAA's own forecasting. Compared with the limited number of other aviation forecasts, the FAA commercial airline forecasts are not overly optimistic. However, it should be noted that all of the aviation forecasters we identified had a natural interest in optimistic forecasts. Some industry observers have even suggested that the recent phenomenal growth in commercial air carrier activity has peaked. General aviation is likely to be overestimated. The FAA has forecasted general aviation to grow by approximately 7 percent from 1997 to 2002. Although recent statistics have suggested that the decline in general aviation activity may have ended, it is unlikely that general aviation can sustain such a high future growth rate as projected. A key indicator suggested by user groups is that the number of general aviation pilots, which has decreased by 25 percent from 1980 to 1996, and is expected to continue to decline. Since general aviation accounts for 60 percent of total U.S. civil airborne hours, such an overestimation will have a significant impact on actual future FAA workloads. Absolute aggregate error averages from 1990 to 1996 of 8.9 percent and 7.7 percent for 5-year RPM and ARTCC operation forecasts respectively indicate that FAA forecasting calculations have been historically overestimated. The impact of these estimates on overall FAA financial requirements depends how closely linked demand is to staffing standards. Air traffic control operation costs continue to increase faster than demand for FAA air traffic control services. The high likelihood that future FAA workloads are overestimated needs to be among the factors considered when estimating future controller staffing needs. In addition, the Coopers & Lybrand assessment implies the possibility for the FAA to increase the efficiency of the air traffic control work force. Some of those possible efficiencies are mentioned above. Further, the average annual growth in operations at air traffic control towers, en route centers, and flight service stations from 1992 to 1997 has been 0.05 percent, 2.13 percent, and -0.55 percent, respectively. Current average operations per hour at en route centers are less than 3 per controller hour, and current average operations per hour at air traffic control towers is less than 6 per controller hour. Those averages would seem to indicate that there is some room for improvement in controller efficiency or staffing coordination. The Committee also notes the recent completion of the labor negotiations between the FAA and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. The Committee believes that careful management of the funds provided in this act will ensure sufficient resources are available to cover the substantial salary increases contained in the agreement. Training .--Pursuant to the recent concerns expressed by the Federal Aviation Administration about the need for retraining of air traffic controllers, the Committee is confident that any training or retraining initiatives can be accommodated within the recommended level. The Committee directs the Administrator to report to the Committee by August 1, 1998, on the following items: (1) the circumstances that led to the decision that retraining of air traffic controllers was necessary; (2) how the incident emerged within the Federal Aviation Administration; (3) the steps taken to both retrain controllers and to insure that deficiencies in the air traffic control system are surfaced immediately and brought to the attention of senior Federal Aviation Administration officials; (4) the anticipated training program for both fiscal years 1998 and 1999. The Committee notes that the FAA has consistently underfunded controller training as compared to the request over the past several years. The Committee encourages the FAA to commit the requested $23,000,000 for training to training and not to allocate those funds to other activities. If the pattern of the past several years continues of diverting training funds for other purposes, additional measures may be taken to insure that critical training activities are not underfunded. As the Federal Aviation Administration reviews its training requirements, the Committee anticipates the establishment, from amounts provided for training, of a university-based center for training, as well as academics and research, that would design and deliver technology-based distance education and training courses to meet the needs and requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration and the general aviation community. Such a center should be designed to address immediate and time-sensitive issues, such as the situation that led to the current decision to retrain controllers, as well as issues in flight standards, aviations safety, human factors, and cabin crew issues. The Committee recommends that such a center be located at an institution which currently possesses the pertinent technology and which has experience with the FAA in training, research, and distance education. Emergency services training .--The Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 for specialized aircraft firefighting training for Federal and non-Federal emergency personnel, at the Rocky Mountain Emergency Services Training Center in Helena, MT. Contract tower program .--The Committee recommendation includes $6,000,000 for a contract tower cost-sharing program. These funds are in addition to those provided for the regular contract tower program. The Committee notes that the Department of Transportation's Inspector General has found that the contract tower program has provided level I air traffic control services at a lower cost for 110 towers previously operated by the FAA and provided air traffic control services at 50 towers the FAA could not have afforded to staff. The new program allows those towers that fall below the FAA threshold to participate in the program by contributing a local match. The Committee believes that this new program will enable small airports to have their tower staffed with an FAA certified air traffic controller; thereby ensuring the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. The FAA is directed to continue operation of the Greenville, MS, contract tower, the Kinston Regional Jetport in North Carolina, the Joplin Regional Airport in Missouri, and the McKellar-Sipes Regional Airport tower in Jackson, TN; and to include the towers at New Bern and Hickory, NC, and at the Cape Girardeau Airport in Missouri under the contract tower cost-sharing program. The Committee urges FAA to work with the communities to explore alternatives, such as sharing tower operating costs, to maintain tower operations. Salisbury air traffic control tower .--The Committee directs the FAA to use such funds as necessary for operational expenses for an air traffic control tower, located in Salisbury, MD, provided that the Federal Aviation Administration has made a prior determination of eligibility for such tower to be included in the contract tower program. Technical noise assistance .--The Committee recommendation includes $100,000 for a technical assistance grant for a local citizens group to retain the services of a technical expert to facilitate the involvement of local citizens as the FAA pursues the existing plans to redesign the airspace. Equipment and staffing deficiencies in the New York/New Jersey region .--The Committee continues to be concerned about the reports regarding staffing and equipment needs at New York/New Jersey area towers, the New York TRACON and the New York Air Traffic Control Center. While progress has been made since last year's subcommittee hearing on this topic, the Committee believes more can be done. The Committee urges the FAA to redouble efforts to improve the safety and efficiency of these facilities. Air traffic control reclassification New York-New Jersey metropolitan region .--The Committee recognizes the recent agreement between the FAA and air traffic controllers to reclassify the compensation structure for air traffic controllers nationwide. However, the Committee is concerned that the initiative, as proposed, threatens to undermine recent advances achieved in increases in controllers staffing levels at the towers of the three major airports--Newark, Kennedy, and LaGuardia. While the reclassification proposes to grant controllers at the New York Center and the New York TRACON an appropriate pay grade level of ATC 12, the controllers at the three major towers would receive a level that is fully two levels lower, creating an unacceptably large disparity in pay. This new pay grade gap generated by the FAA reclassification will serve to undermine all Congress has achieved, as controllers will rapidly leave the towers seeking higher wages. The FAA will not be able to attract and retain the most qualified and seasoned controllers to serve the towers in this busy region. The towers, the New York TRACON, and the New York Center share the same complexity, high volume and density of traffic, and the controllers share the same high cost of living. Congress acted to equalize pay grades among the five facilities in the fiscal year 1991 appropriations act. Consistent with that act the Committee directs the Administrator to take such actions as are necessary to provide for equitable pay levels at the relevant FAA site in the New York/New Jersey area. Cooperative efforts to minimize delays .--The Committee is aware that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Continental Airlines, and the Federal Aviation Administration have entered into an information partnership in an effort to reduce delays in the Nation's most delayed airport, Newark International Airport in Newark, NJ. This partnership, which has been underway since December 1997, has resulted in a substantial effort by all parties to focus energy and resources on these projects which can help to improve the chronic delays suffered by consumers who utilize Newark. As part of this partnership, a list of eight initiatives has been compiled. These are the items upon which the partnership has agreed to focus for 1998. Quarterly meetings have been held to check progress and refocus resources where necessary. The eight initiatives are as follows: airspace redesign; controller automated spacing aid [CASA]; increased use of runway 29 for turbojet departures; Teterboro Airport ILS runway 19; New York ARTCC automated flight plan processing [DSP]; integrated terminal weather system [ITWS]; south final vector radar position-New York TRACON; and optimize airport arrival capacity-runway use. The Committee directs the FAA to provide a quarterly report citing the status of each of these eight initiatives. Reports are to include target dates for completion and explanations for those projects which may exceed their target dates. Reports are to include an assessment of what is required to complete the project (for example, environmental analysis, equipment, personnel). Frederick Municipal Airport .--The Committee understands that the NTSB has recommended the FAA transfer responsibility for the Frederick Municipal Airport airspace from BWI Airport to the Dulles TRACON. Radar coverage at Frederick Municipal Airport currently terminates at 2,300 feet. The transfer would result in lowering radar coverage at Frederick Municipal Airport to approximately 900 feet. The Committee encourages the transfer of responsibilities of this airspace consistent with safety and efficient airspace management. |
||